tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 22 12:31:13 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)

Robyn Stewart ([email protected])

• From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
• Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:21:07 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

pov.

qaStaHvIS wej jaj tlhIngan Hol vIghojnISqa'. jIQapbe'lI' ....

At 11:18 AM 7/22/2007, you wrote:
> > Can you give those translations to distinguish?
> >
> > >Hoch chab
>
>Each pie
>"He tasted each pie"
>
> > >Hoch chabmey
>
>All the pies
>"He took all the pies"
>
> > >chab Hoch
>
>All of the pie
>"He ate all of the pie; not just one slice"
>
> > >chab naQ
>
>A whole pie
>"He took the whole pie, instead of the pie that was already half eaten"
>
> > >naQbogh chab Hoch
>
>All of the pie which is whole
>There are two pies.  One that is whole and one that has a slice or 
>two already taken.
>"He ate all of the pie which was whole"
>
> > >naQbe'bogh chab Hoch
>
>"He ate all of the partial pie.  He finished off the pie that 
>already had a couple slices missing."
>
>
>
>DloraH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.12/910 - Release Date: 
>7/21/2007 3:52 PM

• References:
  • RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
    • From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
  • RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
    • From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
• Next by Date: Don't be left out, join millions of men in the revolution
• Previous by thread: RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
• Next by thread: Re: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level