tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Feb 17 19:03:47 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: pronouns

DloraH ([email protected])

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: pronouns
• Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:01:47 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AcdS7nFOw52N1LGqQBKzpUOJdPodUQAFzBcg

> Is there canon about the use of noun suffixes on pronouns?  
> Most would be 
> illogical or nonsensical, like type 4, but some of the type 
> fives, like -vaD or -mo' would be quite useful.

I don't know about canon, I'll leave that to the canon master; but as for "illogical or
nonsensical"...

Type 4, I could imagine such uses as 'oHwIj; and I have used and seen used 'oHvetlh.  I can even see
ghaHwIj, "Who's girlfriend is she?" "ghaHwIj".
Type 3, I have used jIHqoq.
Type 1, I could imagine them being used for some zen/philosophical discussion. /SoH'a'na'lI'/

But type 2, 'oH, SoH, jIH, ghaH are singular; and bIH, chaH, tlhIH, maH are already plural.  Maybe
someone could try that "scattered about" trick.


Legal?  Don't know.


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: pronouns
    • From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
  • RE: pronouns
    • From: "Elizabeth Lawrence" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • pronouns
    • From: "Elizabeth Lawrence" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: pronouns
• Next by Date: RE: pronouns
• Previous by thread: pronouns
• Next by thread: RE: pronouns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level