tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 18 21:00:49 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:59:40 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

ja' qa'vaj:

> What are your proposals for:
>
> pa'DajDaq chachmo' jIHvaD 'oH QIn'e'
>
> jIHvaD pa'DajDaq chachmo' 'oH QIn'e'

I don't know about anyone else, but I propose burying them in an  
unmarked grave and forgetting they ever existed.  Unless you can  
supply a compelling context, I will ignore them. :-P


Okay, that's not fair.  I won't ignore them.  I'll propose a  
different way to state what I assume the idea is:

    pa'Daj chachmo' jIHvaD QIn lablu'

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: McArdle <[email protected]>
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: qa'vaj <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Next by Date: Re: {-Daq} in complex sentences (was Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe')
• Previous by thread: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Next by thread: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level