tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 17 08:56:12 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:55:07 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Doq wrote:
> Again, I see that we may be lumping together two things that Klingons  
> may see as very different. The relative clause CAN mean "where"  
> without giving us a resolution to the "ship in which I fled" problem.  
> Example:
> 
> DoSDaq ngu'bogh HoD jor peng.
> The torpedo exploded at the target that the captain identified.
> 
> Where did the torpedo explode? The relative clause does fulfill that  
> function.

Interesting point!

SuStel
Stardate 7960.8

-- 
Practice the Klingon language on the tlhIngan Hol MUSH.
http://trimboli.name/klingon/mush.html

• References:
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: Doq <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Next by Date: Re: chagh
• Previous by thread: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Next by thread: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level