tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 16 19:09:05 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:08:11 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' lay'tel SIvten:

> The captain sold the ship I fled in. (or) The captain sold the ship  
> in which
> I fled.
>
> DujDaq jIHaw'.  Dujvetlh ngev HoD.
> [I fled in a ship. The captain sold that ship.]
>
> Avoidance of relative clauses may always be possible by using two  
> sentences.

This is a very old argument, and you've given the typical resolution  
to the problem.  But SuStel was asking how to extend my analysis of  
{jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'} to apply to the question.

As I said in my previous message, I will not so extend my analysis here.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Next by Date: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Previous by thread: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Next by thread: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level