tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 16 14:47:03 2007
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
ja' SuStel:
>>> The locative
>>> meaning applies to {Suv qoH neH}, not {meQtaHbogh qach}.
>>
>> I hope that what you wrote isn't what you meant. Can you rephrase
>> it? As it stands, I must disagree completely. The locative meaning
>> undeniably applies to {meQtaHbogh qach}: "IN a building which
>> burns".
>
> What I wrote is exactly what I meant; you have misunderstood it. The
> locative is a locative of the phrase {Suv qoH neH}. It is not a
> locative
> of the phrase {meQtaHbogh qach}. {qach} is the subject of
> {meQtaHbogh},
> but the locative sense doesn't apply to that clause.
I retract my disagreement with your meaning. I now have trouble only
with how you expressed it. I can accept that the phrase "the
locative meaning applies to" is capable of saying what you intend,
but I would have understood it much better if it were simply "the
locative applies to". I strongly associate "locative meaning" with
the {-Daq} suffix itself, while the word "locative" alone implies the
noun (or phrase) bearing the suffix.
-- ghunchu'wI'