tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 11 22:05:38 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})

MorphemeAddict (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com) [KLI Member] [Hol taghwI']



In a message dated 12/10/2007 12:52:55 PM Central Standard Time, 
david@trimboli.name writes:

> I know it's explicitly stated. That's how I can use it as a 
> demonstration of why proper Klingon (or even colloqial Klingon!) isn't 
> always that which makes the most sense. The point is that if "making 
> sense" were the only criteria for acceptable Klingon, you'd have to 
> throw out a lot of perfectly good, nonsensical rules.
> 


You're calling these rules nonsensical, but they aren't.
That's what threw me off, I think.

lay'tel SIvten   </HTML>






Back to archive top level