tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 14 10:40:35 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)

Doq ([email protected])



KGTDaq paqDaq E->K mu'ghomDaq je <<jorneb>> lo' Okrand, 'ach K->E  
mu'ghomDaq <<jornub>> lo'.

Doq

On Aug 14, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Robyn Stewart wrote:

> jorneb DamaSchugh vaj jorneb yIjatlh, 'ach jurnubqoq ghajchugh
> Qochbogh nuv ral, chaq vuDlIj DaqelnISqa'. :-)
>
> At 10:48 AM 8/14/2007, you wrote:
>> In a message dated 8/14/2007 9:27:05 AM Central Daylight Time,
>> [email protected] writes:
>>
>>> There's probably only one person who can say which is the correct
>> spelling;
>>> until that day, we need to accept both spellings, just like  
>>> jorneb and
>>> jornub. ;-D
>>>
>>> Quvar.
>>>
>>
>> Unless there's a good reason to choose one over the other.
>> In the case you give of {jornub/jorneb}, there is good reason to  
>> choose
>> {jorneb} over {jornub}, namely that its components {jor} and {neb}  
>> are both
>> relevant to the meaning of {jorneb}, whereas {nub} has no such
>> meaning for {jornub}.
>> They're both canon, they're both acceptable, but {jorneb} is better.
>>
>> lay'tel SIvten   </HTML>
>
>
>






Back to archive top level