tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 14 10:20:07 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)

Robyn Stewart ([email protected])

• From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
• Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:07:53 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

jorneb DamaSchugh vaj jorneb yIjatlh, 'ach jurnubqoq ghajchugh 
Qochbogh nuv ral, chaq vuDlIj DaqelnISqa'. :-)

At 10:48 AM 8/14/2007, you wrote:
>In a message dated 8/14/2007 9:27:05 AM Central Daylight Time,
>[email protected] writes:
>
> > There's probably only one person who can say which is the correct 
> spelling;
> > until that day, we need to accept both spellings, just like jorneb and
> > jornub. ;-D
> >
> > Quvar.
> >
>
>Unless there's a good reason to choose one over the other.
>In the case you give of {jornub/jorneb}, there is good reason to choose
>{jorneb} over {jornub}, namely that its components {jor} and {neb} are both
>relevant to the meaning of {jorneb}, whereas {nub} has no such 
>meaning for {jornub}.
>They're both canon, they're both acceptable, but {jorneb} is better.
>
>lay'tel SIvten   </HTML>

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
    • From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
  • Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
    • From: Doq <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: chay' (question)
• Next by Date: RE: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
• Previous by thread: Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
• Next by thread: RE: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level