tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 15 04:37:22 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: question about position of suffixes

QeS 'utlh ([email protected])

• From: "QeS 'utlh" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: question about position of suffixes
• Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:36:35 +1000
• Bcc:

ghItlhpu' ter'eS, ja':
>I believe the correct writing would be your second example: {verengan
>Ha'DIbaH ghaH be'nalwI' wa'DIch'e'}.

I concur with ter'eS and Voragh, for what it's worth.

QeS 'utlh
tlhIngan Hol yejHaD pabpo' / Grammarian of the Klingon Language Institute


not nItoj Hemey ngo' juppu' ngo' je
(Old roads and old friends will never deceive you)
     - Ubykh Hol vIttlhegh

_________________________________________________________________
Find your old friends and discover what they're doing now. 
http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir/adTrack.asp?mode=click&clientID=389&referral=HM_tagline_SEP06&URL=http://ninemsn.schoolfriends.com.au

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: rIQ (verb)
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: question about position of suffixes
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC: question about position of suffixes
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: lo' (noun)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level