tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 29 07:36:07 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Hop veng Sum

ngabwI' ([email protected])

• From: "ngabwI'" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Hop veng Sum
• Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:35:48 -0500
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 4:16 AM
Subject: Re: Hop veng Sum


> I'll use this:
> {jIHDaq veng Hopqu' 'oH veng Sum'e' 'e' vIHar.}
>
> (until someone finds an even better solution ;-)
>
> Quvar.

Don't forget about {-law'}. It expresses the qualification of {'e' vIHar} 
very simply and naturally.

jIHDaq Hopqu'law' veng Sumqu'.

--ngabwI'
Klingon Grammarian
HovpoH 704103.7 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Hop veng Sum
    • From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Hop veng Sum
    • From: "QeS 'utlh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hop veng Sum
    • From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ja'
• Next by Date: Re: squeamish
• Previous by thread: Re: Hop veng Sum
• Next by thread: Re: Hop veng Sum
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level