tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 11 18:03:51 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:01:11 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Dec 10, 2006, at 7:59 PM, ...Paul wrote:
> /Holqoq chu'law'/, then.  :)

That's not valid grammar.  When a verb is used following a noun in  
the manner of an adjective, the only suffixes that may be used on it  
are rovers.  {-qu'} is explicitly permitted in TKD, and {-be'} is  
used in an example on one of the audiotapes.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Klingon WOTD: raD (verb)
    • From: [email protected]
  • Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
    • From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
    • From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Next by Date: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Previous by thread: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Next by thread: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level