tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 10 16:00:46 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?

Thorwald Peeters ([email protected])

• From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:00:07 +0100 (CET)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8

<citaat van="...Paul">
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Thorwald Peeters wrote:
>> Hol chu'qoq "ABSL" vay' HaD'a'?
>
> I think you meant /Holqoq chu'/ (unless you really meant /Hol chu'law'/ --
> "new so-called language" vs. "apparently new language")...  /-qoq/ is a
> Type 3 noun suffix, so it doesn't transition to the adjective following it
> (only Type 5 noun suffixes do that).

Ah... Now here's the pincher... sign language can be called a "so-called
language" and since the article was already a year old, I noticed, the
language, whether so-called or not, although new to me, might even not be
considered new... 8-)

-- 
Thorwald Peeters
a.k.a. qa'pIn qorghon puqloD, qI'meQ tuq
a.k.a. SoplaHtaHwI'
Duj tlhIngan wo' "Qebmey Tai joH"Daq Doq puHvaD Hung loD'e'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Klingon WOTD: raD (verb)
    • From: [email protected]
  • Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
    • From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Next by Date: Re: Heghpu''a' HolQeD?
• Previous by thread: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Next by thread: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level