tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 16 16:18:10 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

no' Hol: pung ghap HoS

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: no' Hol: pung ghap HoS
• Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 19:18:27 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' Shane MiQogh:

> In other words, if you want to sound ancient, learn that format... lol

qech vIQIjta'bogh jatlhbe'chu' mu'meyvetlh.

Those words do not express my meaning at all.  If you need a  
condensed version, try this:  In order to understand idiomatic  
Klingon well, learn to recognize the occasional nongrammatical idiom.

[Can you please try to put your answer *after* what you're quoting?   
Being forced to read your posts from bottom up is getting tiring.]

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: no' Hol: pung ghap HoS
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Hamlet
• Next by Date: Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
• Previous by thread: Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
• Next by thread: Re: no' Hol: pung ghap HoS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level