tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 14 00:54:57 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: mangpu' or negh?
- From: "QeS 'utlh" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: mangpu' or negh?
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:54:34 +1000
- Bcc:
ghItlhpu' Shane MiQogh, ja':
>Exactly, we don't have a need for it, but it's still correct... Fact is,
>just
>because we don't need it, dosn't mean it's incorrect, or alot of synonyms
>wouldn't exist.
DuHbe' bIQ DungDaq lenglaHbogh Duj'e' 'ach yav DungDaq lenglaHbe'bogh.
(Unless you count hovercraft, which I think are just a special case of
vessels that travel on the water.)
>well, the boat that's "on" the water, is also partially under (the bottom).
>Therefor, i'd consider it within the water because it's under and over the
>water.
What about a submarine then, which is technically not just under the water,
but in it? Shouldn't it be an "en-marine"?
>Well, i think -'a' and -Hom and others are just like usage of verbs...
>Multiple
>meanings, like jIQong (i sleep) or (i am asleep) though jIQongtaH (means i
>am sleeping). I beleive that this is how it is, and only context can tell
>what
>the suffix means.
tagha' wa' DoS wIqIp.
QeS 'utlh
tlhIngan Hol yejHaD pabpo' / Grammarian of the Klingon Language Institute
not nItoj Hemey ngo' juppu' ngo' je
(Old roads and old friends will never deceive you)
- Ubykh Hol vIttlhegh
_________________________________________________________________
realestate.com.au: the biggest address in property
http://ninemsn.realestate.com.au