tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 09 13:27:32 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

[KLBC] Da'? (was RE: *be'nI'nal)

Thorwald Peeters ([email protected])

• From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
• Subject: [KLBC] Da'? (was RE: *be'nI'nal)
• Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:27:16 -0000 (GMT)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5

<citaat van="Shane MiQogh">
> If an unstated subject is killing them...

None of that. "The wife of the warrior kills."
Besides that, the sentence was to clarify my understanding (which turned
out to be nihil) of the subject "his/her/its/their <being capable of
speech>"

I wondered why, where I (wI'/wIj) and you (lI'/lIj) he/she/it only has -Daj.

Thorwald Peeters
a.k.a. qa'pIn qorghon puqloD, q'meQ tuq
a.k.a. SoplaHtaHwI'
yuch betleH 'obe' la'quv

• References:
  • Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
    • From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: pIl (verb)
• Next by Date: Re: *be'nI'nal
• Previous by thread: Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
• Next by thread: Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level