tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 09 08:43:28 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal

Thorwald Peeters ([email protected])

• From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
• Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 15:43:15 -0000 (GMT)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5

<citaat van="Shane MiQogh">
> bI'nal SuvwI' HoH = Kill warrior wife It's OVS not OSV...
> Thorwald Peeters <[email protected]> wrote:
> {SuvwI' HoH} "the warrior kills" ->
> {be'nal suvwI' HoH} "the warrior's wife kills"?

I only did have an subject here... Neither is the warrior killing his
wife, nor is his wife killing him...

It would probably be, going on the previous message from Alan (word order
has always been a problem between me and tlhIngan Hol): {HoH suvwI'
be'nal}

> Thorwald Peeters
> a.k.a. qa'pIn qorghon puqloD, q'meQ tuq
> a.k.a. SoplaHtaHwI'
> yuch betleH 'obe' la'quv
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
> countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
>
>


Thorwald Peeters
a.k.a. qa'pIn qorghon puqloD, q'meQ tuq
a.k.a. SoplaHtaHwI'
yuch betleH 'obe' la'quv

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
    • From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
• Next by Date: Re: qep'a' (was Re: On a more humerous note)
• Previous by thread: Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
• Next by thread: Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level