tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 02 10:47:13 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: more Okuda pIqaD?

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
• Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 10:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BtgoZRsvi1RAfP5gqfp1Y/JeVNN0WOfFT3bLAxrka/FHPODlNuQZseGU2YkdvMWmSqZqwAEesl+5B+6pf9Xc9SjR06DjHIXAcPidI8Lst5PlxPaNOYWRSXIJB+/Ot80ws1b5gfykhTsdDxhYr0e8SCXmdtjlWygqBII0RiP4Z6U= ;
• In-reply-to: <a05200f0dc054ccb5a269@[216.80.74.244]>

--- Russ Perry Jr <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The Vulcan language may have no relevance here at
> all, since the
> > sign itself is located in the *town* of Vulcan
> [...]
> 
> I understand that, but I thought an earlier poster
> was implying
> something about the text being in the Vulcan
> language somehow.
> 
> Ah, here it is:
> 
> Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Trying to apply these values to the Vulcan sign
> looks hopeless to
> > me.  And if the sign really says "welcome" _in
> Vulcan_, then all
> > bets are off on what the text is even supposed to
> say.
> 
> The way he stressed "_in Vulcan_", and the grammar
> around it, made
> me think he meant the language.  My apologies if
> that was incorrect.
> 

That was exactly what I meant 8+)

-- ter'eS

• References:
  • Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
    • From: Russ Perry Jr <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
• Next by Date: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
• Previous by thread: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
• Next by thread: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level