tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 28 10:07:45 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: two rovers on one verb

Tad Stauffer ([email protected])

• From: Tad Stauffer <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: two rovers on one verb
• Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:10:33 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

At 10:03 AM 6/28/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>SuStel:
> >So far, we've only seen rovers on verbs that are modifying nouns
> >adjectivally.  Examples:

Voragh:
>Not correct.  Rovers also appear on action verbs.  E.g.:
>
>    yIHaDqu'
>    Study him well. TKD
...

I think what SuStel meant was "So far, we've seen only rovers [and not verb 
suffixes of type 1-9] on verbs that are modifying nouns adjectivally."
i.e., we have not seen examples such as *{tlhIngan ghunglaw'} "the 
apparently hungry Klingon" or *{Duj ngaDbeH} "The ready-to-be-stable vessel"

- taD

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: two rovers on one verb
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: two rovers on one verb
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • RE: two rovers on one verb
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: two rovers on one verb
• Next by Date: RE: two rovers on one verb
• Previous by thread: RE: two rovers on one verb
• Next by thread: RE: two rovers on one verb
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level