tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 25 04:19:06 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: another canon 'mistake'?

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: another canon 'mistake'?
• Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:18:15 EDT

In a message dated 2004-06-24 5:50:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> If
> <DaqlIj> can take on a connotation anything like the word "place" in
> English (e.g. "A woman's place is in the home"), then this means exactly
> what it is supposed to.

Maybe I was taking it too literally.  I thought {DaqlIj} had to mean "your 
location" (i.e., the place where you are located).  You say it may imply "your 
*proper* place".  That makes a lot more sense than anything else I've seen 
about it so far.

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Re: mIvDaq yIH
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: ngeHbej (n)
• Previous by thread: RE: another canon 'mistake'?
• Next by thread: no-object prefix with certain verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level