tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 19 14:04:10 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: moHaq nap, moHaq Qatlh ghap

Heather Myers ([email protected])

• From: "Heather Myers" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: moHaq nap, moHaq Qatlh ghap
• Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:04:09 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

ghItlh QeS lagh:
> 
> WRT {Da}: While not canon, IIRC the word used in the Klingon Hamlet
for
> "actor" or "player" was {DawI'}. Since it lacks a pronoun prefix, this
> word
> doesn't agree with any object (the subject agreement could
theoretically
> be
> argued to be the suffix itself, but I'm not buying into that hairy
> argument).

When you add the suffix -wI' to a verb, it becomes a noun. (TKD 3.2.2,
p. 20)  Verb prefixes may not be added to nouns.  I don't see how there
can be an argument about this.

> QeS lagh

jIqel ghojwI'
<batlh wo' yejHaD je vItoy'mo' jIHem>

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 - Release Date: 15-Jun-2004
 

• References:
  • Re: moHaq nap, moHaq Qatlh ghap
    • From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ghuH
• Next by Date: Re: moHaq nap, moHaq Qatlh ghap
• Previous by thread: Re: moHaq nap, moHaq Qatlh ghap
• Next by thread: Re: moHaq nap, moHaq Qatlh ghap
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level