tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 07 15:45:33 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
- From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:44:54 +1000
- Bcc:
ghItlhpu' Voragh:
>Where possible, the examples should come from canon; that way, we know
>we're using the word correctly and not imposing our own assumptions on it.
>A classic example of this would be trying to come up for something for
>{taH} "be at a negative angle",
"stative" wot 'oHbej {taH}'e' 'e' vIHar, DelmeH "be X" lo'mo' Marc Okrand.
'ach {HeghmoH} "be fatal" wIghaj je... {{:S
wotvam DelmeH chaq mu'tlheghmeyvam DIlo'laH:
choghvat yItaHmoH! (Lower the gangplank!)
tenHa'meH choghvat taH lo' (He disembarks via the gangplank that is
lowered/at a negative angle)
latlh chovnatlhHey Sanob, 'ach lughchu' 'e' vISovbe':
letlh taHDaq yIt (He walks down the stairs that are at a negative angle [or
stairs leading down])
mu'tlheghvam boyaj'a'? lugh'a'?
Savan.
QeS lagh
{taH ta' ta', taH ta' ta, 'a taHtaH ta'.} - jat baghwI'
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your inbox from harmful viruses with new ninemsn Premium. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp?banner=emailtag&referrer=hotmail