tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 03 17:57:01 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 20:56:11 EDT

In a message dated 2004-06-03 8:53:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> Please consider that others may (and do) have different experiences and
> opinions than you do.  There is no one true way.
> 
> jIqel ghojwI'
> 

Of course you are right.  It seems, though, that the way I mentioned is being 
slighted in favor of other ways.

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: RE: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Next by Date: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Previous by thread: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Next by thread: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level