tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 03 06:54:39 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:53:46 EDT

In a message dated 2004-06-02 6:11:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> Where possible, the examples should come from canon; that way, we know 
> we're using the word correctly and not imposing our own assumptions on 
> it.  

Agreed.  ALL of the appropriate canon should be used for each given word.  
But as you indicated, some of the words have simply never been used in canon.  
Yet the words *are* used, and as long as the source is given, non-canon should 
be included too, especially if it's not really controversial.  

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Re: to create -> to be creative
• Next by Date: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Previous by thread: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Next by thread: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level