tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 10 16:04:01 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: tlhIngan maH!

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: tlhIngan maH!
• Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:03:18 EDT

In a message dated 2004-08-10 4:47:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, De'vID jonwI' wrote:
> > Actually, they spelled it "t l h I ng g a ng  m a H".  They
> > misused the "ng" glyph instead of the "n" glyph.
> 
> Wouldn't it be "t l H I ng gh a ng   m a H", if we're getting all
> technical?  ;)
> 
> ...Paul
> 

In the Mandel script, which is what this is written in, there is no "gh" 
glyph.  It's pretty much the English alphabet with "oo", "ng", "th" added, and no 
"q" or "c".  
My own suggestion for the best way to spell {tlhIngan maH} in Mandel is "th i 
ng a n    m a h".  

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Re: tlhIngan maH!
• Next by Date: Re: puvlI'bogh (was Re: nughI')
• Previous by thread: Re: tlhIngan maH!
• Next by thread: New animated movie
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level