tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat May 24 03:41:24 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: jang pagh?

• From: Quvar valer (Lieven) <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: jang pagh?
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 10:37:26 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

You see, KLBC in the subject line gets my attention much quicker :-)

Your mail is not lost, I'm working on it. 
Just as the other from Leah, which was a bit longer.
Habt geduld!
They'll be answered tonight.

Quvar.
 Beginners' GRammarian
ghojwI'pu'wI' vISaHbej

• References:
  • KLBC: jang pagh?
    • From: "Jens Schicke" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: use of "latlh"
• Next by Date: Re: use of "latlh"
• Prev by thread: KLBC: jang pagh?
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: jang pagh?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level