tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 15 23:06:16 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Shooting space garbage

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Shooting space garbage
• Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:46:48 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>

ja'pu' Voragh:
> Where is this so glossed?  The line is "shooting space garbage", not
> "shooting AT space garbage".

ja' marqoS:
>It's in the syntactic expansion of the line (not the subtitle translation)
>which you quoted; I assumed that part was also from Okrand.  It begins
>"If he shoots at . . .".

That's the stilted, *literal* translation of the line.  It's not
necessarily the right meaning when you interpret it idiomatically.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: Opposite of -wI'
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Opposite of -wI'
    • From: "Se'noj le'umaS" <[email protected]>
  • Shooting space garbage
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Shooting space garbage
    • From: "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SoSwI' vISuchtaHvIS...
• Next by Date: Re: JangmeH toch De'wI' lo'
• Prev by thread: Re: Shooting space garbage
• Next by thread: Re: Shooting space garbage
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level