tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 02 13:16:31 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Opposite of -wI'

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Opposite of -wI'
• Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:10:22 EDT

In a message dated 5/22/2003 11:27:45 PM Mountain Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> peHruS: Do you recall Mark's argument for why one probably couldn't use 
> *<<-lu'wI'>>?

I'd have to find the message from Mark in the archives.  Basically, he 
thought it just did not work.

peHruS

• Prev by Date: Re: Opposite of -wI'
• Next by Date: Qapla': Noun or Exclamation?
• Prev by thread: -meH (was: Re: Opposite of -wI')
• Next by thread: Re: Opposite of -wI'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level