tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 12 08:45:04 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: object of {ra'}



From: <[email protected]>
> > What's the object of {ra'} "command"?
> >
> >    yIHoH 'e' vIra'
> >    yIHoH, qara'
>
> Canon for /ra'/:
> >>>
> qara'DI'      as soon as I command you
>
> qara'pa'      before I command you
>
> cha yIbaH qara'DI'
> qara'DI' cha yIbaH    Fire the torpedoes at my command.  [p. 62]
>
> chay' jura'  What are your orders? (How do you command us?)
>
> [Korrd: petIv'egh.  qara'qu'
>   Enjoy yourselves.  That's an order.]
>
>
> qIvo'rIt toQDuj 'oH tlhIngan wo' Duj pagh'e'.  ra' qarghan HoD.  DujvamDaq
> tlhIngan nuH tu'lu'bogh pov law' Hoch pov puS 'ej DujvamDaq 'op SuvwI'
> tu'lu'bogh po' law' tlhIngan yo' SuvwI' law' po' puS.
>
> The Imperial Klingon Vessel Pagh is a K'Vort-class Bird-of-Prey under the
> command of Captain Kargan.  It has the best weapons and some of the finest
> warriors in the Klingon fleet.
> <<<
>
> These all look like the person/thing commanded is the object; not the
action
> they are to take.


And of course the problem is that the existence of the prefix trick makes
every single one of these examples ambiguous (except for /ra' qarghan HoD/,
which was already ambiguous).  The correct object might be the commandee, or
it might be something else, but the prefix trick changes the prefix.  We
know, for instance, that /qajatlh/ means "I speak to you," even though the
object of /jatlh/ is not the addressee.

In other words, we do not know for certain what the proper object of /ra'/
is.

SuStel
Stardate 3117.3


Back to archive top level