tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 07 10:23:48 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: use of "KLBC"

• From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: use of "KLBC"
• Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:59:03 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ghItlh ngabwI':

>So I can get my {tlhIngan Hol} critiqued by anyone?

Correct. There are many people out there who just love it to spellcheck every message, and then tell you how you can do it better.

>want. I do understand that the advice might be contradictory, but I think
>I'm getting a feel for this language, and am, for the most part, able to
>filter out extraneous info.)

What you're saying is that you got too old to play with KLBC ;-)

>'ach tlhIngan Hol vIjatlhtaHvIS *KLBC*vaD jIghel net chaw', qar'a'?

reH KLBC Dalo' net chaw', 'ej Hol Dalo'bogh DawIvlaH SoH.
ghomvamDaq wa' pab potlh wIghaj: 
  DIvI' Hol Dalo'DI, tlhIngan Hol yIqel!
  latlh DaqelDI', tlhIngan Hol yIlo'! 

>Why not {maHvaD Qum ngabwI'}?
>Isn't the object of {Qum} supposed to be the thing communicated (idea, word,
>coordinates, love of chickens, etc.), or I am missing something?

This is an interesting question to seriuosly consider. I'll let someone else answer this.

Quvar
  ghojwI'pu'lI' tISaH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Qum
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: use of "KLBC"
    • From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: =?windows-1252?Q?Re:=20I=B4m=20a=20new=20member,=20Noel=20is=20my=20name.?=
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: comparative structure as clause
• Prev by thread: Re: use of "KLBC"
• Next by thread: Re: Qum
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level