tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 24 16:37:26 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: tam naDev...



From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, David Trimboli wrote:
> > Personally, I don't think that /ghoH/ takes an object.  Instead of */'oH
> > wIghoH/, say /'oHmoH maghoH/.
>
> /'oHmoH/?  You mean /'oHmo'/ "We argue because of it", qar'a'?

HIja'.  jIjatlhHa'.

SuStel
Stardate 3312.5


Back to archive top level