tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 24 16:33:43 2003
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: tam naDev...
- From: Eric Andeen <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: tam naDev...
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:28:59 -0700
>>> Personally, I don't think that /ghoH/ takes an object.
>>> Instead of */'oH wIghoH/, say /'oHmoH maghoH/.
>> /'oHmoH/? You mean /'oHmo'/ "We argue because of it",
>> qar'a'?
> Weird. I read it the first time as {'oHmo' maghoH}, and
> didn't realize the typo until Paul pointed it out.
> jIDoy'qu'ba'.
vIlaDHa' je jIH. pIj QaghHommeyHey vIleghbe' 'ej mu'mey'e' vIpIHbogh vIlegh.
laDmeH Qu' ngeDmoH, 'ach lughmoHmeH Qu' QatlhmoH.
pagh