tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 24 15:44:16 2003
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: tam naDev...
- From: "d'Armond Speers" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: tam naDev...
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:38:45 -0600
>From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: tam naDev...
>Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
>
>On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, David Trimboli wrote:
> > Personally, I don't think that /ghoH/ takes an object. Instead of */'oH
> > wIghoH/, say /'oHmoH maghoH/.
>
>/'oHmoH/? You mean /'oHmo'/ "We argue because of it", qar'a'?
Weird. I read it the first time as {'oHmo' maghoH}, and didn't realize the
typo until Paul pointed it out. jIDoy'qu'ba'.
>...Paul
--
d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.
[email protected]
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus