tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 15 14:21:58 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: 'aH tIQ

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: 'aH tIQ
• Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:17:40 -0400 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> /-vam/ and /-vetlh/ seem to be a sticky point
> that are either underused or overused.  ;)

I have no problem with -vam and -vetlh.  wanI' is a noun.

 
> Thus, "QublaHchugh ghom'a', vaj qubbej wanI'vetlh" seems like a kludge --
> IFF /wanI'vetlh/ is referring to the /ghom'a'/.  If it wasn't, then yes,
> my comment is unnecessary.

This is why I thought he was refering to the 'event' of 'they destroyed the 
museum'.


DloraH

PS: As I am a programmer, your use of IFF confused me for a few seconds.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 'aH tIQ
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: 'aH tIQ
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 'aH tIQ
• Next by Date: Re: 'aH tIQ
• Prev by thread: Re: 'aH tIQ
• Next by thread: Re: 'aH tIQ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level