tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 15 18:36:37 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Dajatlhbogh

• From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Dajatlhbogh
• Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 19:30:13 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Am 15.09.2002 16:08:42, schrieb "Sangqar (Sean Healy)" <[email protected]>:

>I don't believe that there is any specific prohibition against it, but isn't 
>it a list convention not to use naked -bogh verbs?  So
>
>{lugh Doch Dajatlhbogh}
>"the thing which you say is correct"

I replaced {Doch} by {'oH}, and we get this:
  {lugh 'oH Dajatlhbogh}
  "it which you say is correct"

TKD says pronouns are "not required", so I have:
  {lugh Dajatlhbogh}
  "which you say is correct"

Quvar
levinius.de
ghojwI'pu'lI' tISaH.

• References:
  • Re: Dajatlhbogh
    • From: "Sangqar (Sean Healy)" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Dajatlhbogh
• Next by Date: Re: pets
• Prev by thread: RE: Dajatlhbogh
• Next by thread: ram Duj mung
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level