tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 12 10:03:07 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: lugh
Am 12.09.2002 10:43:02, schrieb Steven Boozer <[email protected]>:
>I don't have {lughmoH} as a separate entry from Okrand in my notes. Where
>did you see that defined?
Actually, me neither. :-/
>I know of know evidence either way, though we have long been using
>{lughmoH} for "correct (something)" on the list.
I think that's where I got it from.
>All the examples I know of are for the stem {lugh} "be correct, be right":
>
> bIlugh
> You're right. TKD
>
> bIlughbe'
> You're wrong. TKD
Is that the same as {bImuj}, or can only an answer be {muj}?
In German there are two different meanings and two different translations for that.
>Until we see something to the contrary, I think you're safe in saying
>{qalughmoH} "I correct you", {cholughmoH 'e' DangIl'a'?} "Do you dare
>correct me?", etc.
okay. Thanks.
Quvar.