tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 08 12:35:20 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: EK: ghomqa'ghach

ghItlh "DloraH" <>:

>DIp 'oHbe' nuq?  Qovpatlh?  TKD p178
>lugh mu'tlheghvam
   It's called "exclamations", I always thought the cannot be used like nouns, only as "sentences in their 
own right": {petaQ!!} and not {toDSaH ghaHbej.} (I asked for that several years ago)

>I don't know any canon for /tlhe'/.
   There seems to be none yet.

>this can't be used as evidence for /tlhe'/; 
>but I think /matlhe'/ is ok.
   I think {matlhe''egh} is ok.  ;-)
chaq. net Sovlu' pagh [sic!!]


Back to archive top level