tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 04 21:28:24 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: grammAr check

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: grammAr check
• Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 22:26:07 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> From: Sangqar (Sean Healy)
>
> Because I know the context, I would suggest {DIqawmeH} (or perhaps {DIqaw
> wIneHmo'}) here (as opposed to {DIqawmo'}, but that's the only suggestion
> I'll give, as I don't want to step on DloraH's toes.
>
> mu'vam Hal vISovchu'.  qaQaHqang DaneHchugh.

Thankyou.  I was going to bring up that question in my reply; whether the
context wanted -meH or -mo'.


DloraH, BG

• References:
  • re: grammAr check
    • From: "Sangqar (Sean Healy)" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: re: grammAr check
• Next by Date: Re: HeghmeH QaQbogh jaj yIngu'
• Prev by thread: re: grammAr check
• Next by thread: RE: grammAr check
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level