tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 22 20:37:47 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Usage of parmaqay, loDnI and be'nI

From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Usage of parmaqay, loDnI and be'nI
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:24:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <008501c27a00$28207680$0112bdd0@compaq>
References: <008501c27a00$28207680$0112bdd0@compaq>

ja' "Sebastian DuMars" <[email protected]>:
>I believe that refering to ones' spouse as parmaqay would be seen as a
>denial of the marriage bond and therefore is a serious insult.

Qo'.  tlhogh HoSmoH parmaq.  tlhogh tembe' per.  parmaqqaywI' ghaHbej
be'nalwI''e'.  'ach roD ngoDvam'e' vImaqbe'.  parmaqmaj vIle'moH 'e' vImaS.

be'nalwI'vaD parmaqqay vIpongDI', manong 'e' vIbuS.  mamobbe'taHvIS, motlh
ghu'vam vIbuS vIneHbe'.

-- ghunchu'wI'

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Usage of parmaqay, loDnI and be'nI
  - From: "Sebastian DuMars" <[email protected]>

References:
- Usage of parmaqay, loDnI and be'nI
  - From: "Sebastian DuMars" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: toQDuj
Next by Date: RE: Tao Te Ching; Chp. 9
Prev by thread: Re: Usage of parmaqay, loDnI and be'nI
Next by thread: Re: Usage of parmaqay, loDnI and be'nI
Index(es):