tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 22 14:46:24 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: Tao Te Ching; Chp. 9

> >lot yIghuH - beware of a catastrophe
> >yIghuH - beware
> Is it really OK to use ghuH without an explicit object?
> DoS HutlhlaHlaw''a' mu' {ghuH}?

alerted, be alerted to (v)		ghuH

The first word does not imply an object; to me it looks like it can be used 
either way, with or without.

Canon:  ropyaH yIghuHmoH

You're causing the ropyaH to ghuH, not to ghuH 'something'.


Back to archive top level