tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 06 15:40:58 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon WOTD: peQ (n)

• From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: peQ (n)
• Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 16:44:04 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

wrote Steven Boozer <[email protected]>:

>nb: {peQ chem} is two words, unlike {HoSchem} energy field, {pIvchem} warp 
>field and {Surchem} force field.

I think it's obvious that {chem} is a noun for "field" (talking physics, not landscaping).
But this word has no own entry. Right?

Quvar
  ghojwI'pu'lI' tISaH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: peQ (n)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • chem (was Re: Klingon WOTD: peQ (n))
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: peQ (n)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tao Te Ching
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: peQ (n)
• Prev by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: peQ (n)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: peQ (n)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level