wej and -be' (was RE: god (was: Re: a word is needed?))

["qurgh lungqIj" <qurgh@kdfs.net>]

Hehe, that exactly what I was thinking.

Dochvam vIparbe' 'ach Dochvam vIparHa'be'

I don't dislike that thing, but I don't like it either

We have seen -qu' and be' together, and -Ha' and qu' together, so I
don't see any problem with -Ha' and -be' (and -qu' if you want to go the
whole nine yards)

vIparHa'be'qu' - I really do not like it (but I still don't dislike it)

Which makes me think of something else, how does wej operate with verbs
with -be' in them.

wej qaSbe' - "It has not yet not occurred" or "It has not yet occurred"?

Do the "not"s stack up or do they negate each other?

qurgh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TPO [mailto:cheesbro@rpa.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:50 PM
> To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
> Subject: RE: god (was: Re: a word is needed?)
> 
> > Qunpu' vIparHa'be'. (is that a word?)
> >
> > qurgh
> 
> It looks like you thought in english "I do not like.."; You took the
word
> parHa'/like and added -be' to negate it.  In klingon one would start
with
> dislike/par.  But of course, just because you don't like something
doesn't
> have to mean that you dislike it.  You could have no opinion about the
> subject.
> 
> We do have canon in TKD with multiple rovers; altho I didn't see any -
> Ha'be'
> combinations.
> 
> 
> DloraH, BG