tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 13 19:27:11 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
wej and -be' (was RE: god (was: Re: a word is needed?))
Hehe, that exactly what I was thinking.
Dochvam vIparbe' 'ach Dochvam vIparHa'be'
I don't dislike that thing, but I don't like it either
We have seen -qu' and be' together, and -Ha' and qu' together, so I
don't see any problem with -Ha' and -be' (and -qu' if you want to go the
whole nine yards)
vIparHa'be'qu' - I really do not like it (but I still don't dislike it)
Which makes me think of something else, how does wej operate with verbs
with -be' in them.
wej qaSbe' - "It has not yet not occurred" or "It has not yet occurred"?
Do the "not"s stack up or do they negate each other?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TPO [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:50 PM
> To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
> Subject: RE: god (was: Re: a word is needed?)
> > Qunpu' vIparHa'be'. (is that a word?)
> > qurgh
> It looks like you thought in english "I do not like.."; You took the
> parHa'/like and added -be' to negate it. In klingon one would start
> dislike/par. But of course, just because you don't like something
> have to mean that you dislike it. You could have no opinion about the
> We do have canon in TKD with multiple rovers; altho I didn't see any -
> DloraH, BG