tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 11 18:29:01 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: jIH vIchuHlu' - Words mentioned earlier but not in the

ja' qe'San:
>...I just wish people
>couldn't get away with bending the truth the way Keith did..  He could have
>just stopped at acknowledging advice from MO but saying the list was vetted
>by Mo was what made me really wonder.

The term "vetted" really doesn't mean "authorized" the way you seem to be
taking it.  It basically just means "examined".  There's an implication of
approval, but there's no special status granted to what has been examined.
I think that's the root of your continued nagging about whether the D.I.
glossary is canon, even after getting strongly worded opinions about how
many (most?) of us count only "official" work by Marc Okrand in that

-- ghunchu'wI'

Back to archive top level