tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 07 14:59:23 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: -bogh
SuStel wrote:
>For example,
> HoHbogh SuvwI' 'ej qabDaj 'angbe'bogh
> warrior who kills and who doesn't reveal his face
>There is no sentence here, there is just a complicated noun phrase. The
>VERBS are being joined by /'ej/.
Or you can put {SuvwI'} at the end of the string:
HoHbogh 'ej qabDaj 'angbe'bogh SuvwI'
on the model of:
romuluSngan Sambogh 'ej HoHbogh nejwI'
Romulan hunter-killer probe (KCD)
Since there's no noun following the first {-bogh}, the reader is forced to
look for it at the end, thereby tying the whole phrase more closely
together IMHO. This, however, is a matter of personal style and is a
minority preference on this list. There is also a counter-example from KGT:
SuDbogh Dargh 'ej wovbogh
The tea that is {SuD} and light.
(meaning "light green/yellow tea")
where Okrand kept the governing noun with the first {-bogh}.
>If this were split apart, it might be
>
> HoHbogh SuvwI'
> the warrior who kills
>
> qabDaj 'angbe'bogh SuvwI'
> the warrior who doesn't show his face
It's just a matter of which of the two {SuvwI'} you're eliding.
Chacun a son gout.
--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons
- References:
- RE: -bogh
- Re: -bogh
- From: "David Trimboli" <SuStel@hotmail.com>
- Re: -bogh
- From: "qe'San \(temp ADSL email\)" <qeSan@btclick.com>
- Re: -bogh
- From: "David Trimboli" <SuStel@hotmail.com>