tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 18 07:16:27 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: I think, therefore I am

• From: "christoph.pichlmann" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: I think, therefore I am
• Date: 18 Jun 2002 14:13:28 +0200

<sigh> I have to correct myself - jItuH (I am ashamed).

>Here s what I found on
"http://www.khemorex-klinzhai.de/Hol/itabashi/mumey.html ":
>jIQubmo' jIHtaH.

I mis-interpreted the "taH" - because I was using the verb, I thought
they d use it too - they used the suffix of course. That explains the
"jIHtaH".

Yet I d like to know if my version is wrong, or just different.

Christoph

• Prev by Date: RE: I think, therefore I am.
• Next by Date: Re: Headers. Yet again.
• Prev by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: SeS (n)
• Next by thread: Hol ghojlu''a'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level