tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 14 15:38:26 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: syntax

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: syntax
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:37:20 -0400
• References: <[email protected]>

qon SuStel ['e' maq Andrew Strader]:
>Perhaps using {-Daq} on a following ordinal, which occupies the same
>position as a modifying quality - e.g. {veng wa'DIch}, {veng tInqu'} - is a
>variant of this rule.  It may feel more natural for Klingons to put these
>particular noun suffixes on the modifier, even if it isn't a noun.  Put
>them on the entire noun + modifier phrase in other words:  {[veng
>wa'DIch]Daq}, {[veng tInqu']Daq}, etc.

mu'tlheghmeyvam vIqonbe' jIH 'a jIQochbe' je.  :)

SuStel
Stardate 2452.7

• References:
  • syntax
    • From: Andrew Strader <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: the banned book (was: Re: klingon letters)
• Next by Date: (correction) Re: syntax
• Prev by thread: syntax
• Next by thread: Re: syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level