tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 29 12:40:11 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: pawwI' paSqu' (was RE: qep'a' plans)

• From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: pawwI' paSqu' (was RE: qep'a' plans)
• Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 18:04:26 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <a05100312b9678b50e552@[216.117.64.6]>
• References: <[email protected]><a05100312b9678b50e552@[216.117.64.6]>

>ja' pagh:
>>jIpawDI' paSbej ram. 10:33 PM paw muDDuj net nab.
>>ghaytan mebpa' lupwI' vIlIghnIS.

/muDDuj/ - plane
/mebpa'/ - hotel

is this grammatical? can we form such nouns without having canon 
sentences from MO?

>bIpaSbej jay'.  SoHvaD 'uQ'a' chuvwI' wIpol DaneH'a'
>
>-- ghunchu'wI'

why not /chuvmey/ instead of /chuvwI'/?

sts.

• References:
  • RE: qep'a' plans
    • From: Eric Andeen <[email protected]>
  • pawwI' paSqu' (was RE: qep'a' plans)
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: adverbs
• Next by Date: Re: jIropchoH
• Prev by thread: pawwI' paSqu' (was RE: qep'a' plans)
• Next by thread: Re: qep'a' plans
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level