tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 21 20:57:10 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Ten Commandments

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Ten Commandments
• Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 20:55:23 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]><[email protected]>

ja' SuStel:
>Umm, I don't know anything about the original Hebrew, but doesn't the word
>"Commandments" kind of imply . . . I don't know . . . "commands"?

loQ 'IvrIt vISovmo', chaq mu' vIQIjlaH.  'IvrIt lalDan ghItlhDaq, <mu'mey>
neH luperlu'.  roD "mitzvah" luponglu'.  rapchu'be' "mitzvah" "commandment"
je.  chaq <potlh> <ngoQ> joq 'oSlaH "mitzvah".  rut "commandment" 'oH, 'ach
'opvaD motlh chut'a' 'oHbe'.

http://www.factmonster.com/ipd/A0540458.html yIHotlh.  "commandments or
precepts" yIlaD.

>At least
>in the Klingon version, I'm sure that would be okay . . . .

It's okay in just about every version that exists, actually, including
scholarly commentaries on the Pentateuch.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ten Commandments
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: Ten Commandments
    • From: "Sangqar (Sean Healy)" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Ten Commandments
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: question #2
• Next by Date: KLBG: pu' , ta' , rIntaH
• Prev by thread: Re: Ten Commandments
• Next by thread: Re: Ten Commandments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level