tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 05 09:47:58 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: wa'DIch as a time stamp?

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: wa'DIch as a time stamp?
• Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 10:48:10 -0400 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: <a0511170fb9491e850cef@[151.25.138.161]>
• References: <1ZUPMJELIB93Z3Z41VTC896SOE0JF3Z.3d231acf@pc> <[email protected]> <a0511170fb9491e850cef@[151.25.138.161]>
• User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> >I guess nobody reads my messages.  (sniff) :(
> 
> teHbe'. tetlhvamDaq narghbe'law' neH.
> (that's not true. it apparently simply didn't appear on the list.)

It's in the archive, 2 Jul, 1930 hr

DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: wa'DIch as a time stamp?
    • From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: wa'DIch as a time stamp?
    • From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
  • Re: wa'DIch as a time stamp?
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: wa'DIch as a time stamp?
    • From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: pabmey nap pagh napHa' - naDevvo'
• Next by Date: Re: invention and innovation - tulwI' Hol
• Prev by thread: Re: wa'DIch as a time stamp?
• Next by thread: Re: wa'DIch as a time stamp?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level