tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 30 00:07:12 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: chay' mu'meyvam lo'lu'?
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: chay' mu'meyvam lo'lu'?
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:07:08 EST
jijatlh:
>For what it's worth (and since it is my sentence), I agree with Voragh. I
>first wrote {ta' qIp puqvetlh 'e' ngIl}, for the reason Voragh gives, but
>then considered that the subject of {ngIl} would be ambiguous if I didn't
>state it. (Although, in reality, who would think it was the emperor who was
>daring to be hit by the child?)
Correction: It was ghunchu'wI' I was agreeing with, not Voragh.
-Sengval